The ability to create synthetic videos outweighs detection methods by ‘100 to 1’, according to a digital forensics professor at UC Berkeley quoted in The Washington Post

The US public is not ready for the possible consequences of deepfakes in the upcoming Presidential elections, the Post reports.

AI researchers are ‘racing to defuse an extraordinary political weapon: computer-generated fake videos.’ Differences between real and fake may be imperceptible to the human brain within 18 to 24 months. At the same time, the software is becoming more accessible.

Some uses can be highly creative, generating new images and videos never before imagined or expressed by humans. Others create lifelike images and videos that can be used maliciously, such as political leaders appearing to say untrue things or individuals engaged in derogatory activities.


  • A deepfake of Mark Zuckerberg attracted attention as a piece of art unapproved by the Facebook founder.
  • Americans believe ‘made-up news’ is a bigger problem than violent crime, immigration, terrorism, racism or sexism, according to a new study by Pew Research.


  • In a world where video (and audio) can be routinely falsified, the public increasingly relies on news outlets to mediate trustworthy information.
  • Detecting deepfakes goes well beyond current competencies in fact-checking. New skills and new technologies will be needed.
  • Look for a ‘truth arms race’ as tools to create deepfakes become more sophisticated, requiring better tools to identify forgeries.



Top AI researchers race to detect ‘deepfake’ videos: ‘We are outgunned’ THE WASHINGTON POST | June 12, 2019 | by Drew Harwell